Speaking to the ISNA news agency, Esmail Baghaei specified that once the analysis of the key points concludes, the results will be conveyed through the mediation of Pakistan.
This development marks a critical juncture in the ongoing diplomatic efforts to de-escalate regional tensions and establish a framework for future relations between the two nations.
RELATED: Iran, China Discuss Security, Hormuz, Strategic Ties
In a post on the social media platform X, Baghaei elaborated on Tehran’s stance regarding the essence of negotiations, referencing international law and a ruling by the International Court of Justice. The official underscored that this process demands “good faith” and “a genuine attempt to engage in discussions with the objective of resolving the dispute.”
In this sense, he explicitly clarified that to negotiate does not imply dictation, deception, extortion or coercion, thus setting a clear principled boundary for the ongoing discussions.
U.S. Key Points Proposed
U.S. officials have indicated that Washington expects a response from Tehran on several key points within a 48-hour timeframe.
According local media, the proposed agreement document comprises 14 points, which are currently being negotiated by President Donald Trump’s envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, through both direct channels and intermediaries with Iranian officials. Sources within Pakistan have corroborated that the matter could potentially conclude with a bilateral agreement in the near future, signaling optimism for a resolution.
The current draft of the proposal explicitly declares an end to the war in the region, initiating a 30-day period for intensive negotiations. During this crucial interval, both sides will seek detailed agreements concerning the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, the limitation of the Iranian nuclear program and the lifting of U.S. sanctions.
The proposed venues for these pivotal meetings are Islamabad or Geneva, offering neutral ground for the complex discussions ahead. Should the negotiations fail to progress, U.S. forces maintain the option to reimpose the blockade or resume military operations, a measure intended to exert leverage in the diplomatic process.
Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi has consistently highlighted Iran’s willingness for dialogue, provided it is not conducted under U.S. pressures. Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the entire process as complex and technical, stressing the imperative for a clear diplomatic solution involving concessions from both parties. Despite the potential for paralysis in the talks, U.S. officials have noted that the recent suspension of military operations in the Strait of Hormuz was a direct result of progress observed in the ongoing discussions, indicating a tangible impact of the diplomatic engagement.
Regarding nuclear conditions and guarantees, sources present differing views on the duration for uranium enrichment suspension. Initial reports suggested a 12 to 15-year period, a compromise between Iran’s proposed five years and the United States’ demand for 20 years. The agreement would reportedly include an automatic extension clause in the event of any non-compliance.
Upon the expiration of the agreed term, Tehran would be permitted to enrich uranium up to a low level of 3.67%, a figure consistent with peaceful civilian use. Iran would commit to refraining from developing nuclear weapons, accepting a reinforced UN inspection that includes surprise visits and potentially renouncing underground facilities.
Furthermore, discussions are underway regarding the transfer of highly enriched uranium out of the country, with the United States being a possible destination. This aspect underscores the depth of the negotiations and the extent of the trust-building measures being considered by both sides to secure a lasting peace and stability in the region.
Iran Warns Possible U.S. Deception
Iranian Armed Forces spokesman, Brigadier General Abolfazl Shekarchi, warned that Iran is prepared to inflict a “humiliating defeat” on its adversaries if the U.S. uses negotiations as cover for future aggression. The official urged Washington and Israel to avoid miscalculation when testing the military capacity of the Islamic Republic, noting that such provocations inevitably end in failure.
Although U.S. President Donald Trump suspended the military operation in the Strait of Hormuz, citing progress toward a possible settlement, Shekarchi warned that these talks could be a tool of deception.
On May 3, Tehran delivered to Pakistan a 14-point proposal with its unremovable conditions, which include a guarantee of military non-aggression, the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the Iranian environment and an end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon. The document also provides for compensation payments and a new management formula for the Strait of Hormuz – requirements that President Donald Trump has called “unacceptable.”
Tehran has maintained its openness to dialogue and strict control of the Strait of Hormuz since the U.S. and Israeli aggression on February 28, conditioning Washington by demonstrating force and defending its sovereignty. In the face of the Persian nation’s unwavering stance, the U.S. Government opted for a “diplomatic path”, though Iran warns that it remains prepared against any deception.
[ SOURCE: teleSUR ]
